近年學術倫理在臺灣受到高度的重視，但由於對自我抄襲的理解與討論有限，故在其認定原則與標準上，尚缺乏明確的共識。有鑑於此，本文之目的在於釐清自我抄襲的內涵，以協助學術界能由更正向與多元的角度看待這個新倫理議題。本文以文本分析法，研析過去與自我抄襲相關的文獻與規範。在論述上，本文首先探討自我抄襲的內涵，包含此概念的演進歷程、定義、判定方式、納入與排除的具體情事，以及應避免為之的原因;接續透過發生於荷蘭的真實案例，敘說自我抄襲所引起的兩極化爭議;本文亦整理出臺灣中央主管機關在自我抄襲相關規範上之沿革，並於文末提出有助於預防自我抄襲的辦法。
Category Archives: Research Products
研究論文 | 台灣研究人員學術倫理概念調查研究之初探：以科技部公布之學術抄襲、未適當引註及自我抄襲概念為例
本研究透過匿名調查問卷，蒐集到台灣研究人員（包括五位學術倫理專家與232位科技部專題研究計畫主持人）之問卷，探討其對學術抄襲、未適當引註及自我抄襲等概念之理解。
The present study adopts a survey method, inviting five experts of academic ethics and 232 local researchers (i.e., principal investigators [PIs] of MOST-funded research projects) to explore their (mis)understanding regarding the topics of plagiarism, improper citations, and self-plagiarism through case scenarios.
研究論文 | Taiwanese researchers’ perceptions of questionable authorship practices: An exploratory study
A new paper has been published in Science and Engineering Ethics. In this piece, we discussed the underlying causes of questionable authorship and culture-bound authorship practices in an East Asian academia – Taiwan.
會議簡報 | The first decade of RCR education in Taiwan: Reflection from an early-career scholar
Pan, S. J.-A. (2020, February). The first decade of RCR education in Taiwan: Reflection from an early-career scholar. Orally presented at the 29th Annual APPE (Association for Practical and Professional Ethics) International Conference, Atlanta, GA. February 20-23, 2020.
評論文章 | 淺談學術倫理案件處分之審酌內容
為讓學術倫理案件之相關處分，符合公平正義及法治國所要求之比例原則，我們在研讀國內外相關文獻與法律後，於本文提出學術倫理案件處分之審酌內容，希冀作為各機構就每則案件之特性所為處分的參考依據。
Sophia J. Pan, PhD 