sophiapanxx

課程簡報 | 109 學年度第二學期：大同大學研究發展處學術倫理講座

簡報主題：從自我抄襲談學術出版的透明與課責

研究論文 | Taiwanese and American graduate students’ misconceptions regarding responsible conduct of research: A cross-national comparison using a two-tier test approach

My new article has been published in Science and Engineering Ethics. In this piece, I discussed how cross-research system students might view responsible conduct of research (RCR) in different ways and the utility of applying two-tier tests in RCR instruction.

課程簡報 | 2021 中央研究院學術研究倫理教育訓練課程

簡報主題：誰可以當作者？

會議簡報 | Preventing research misconduct through education: The 2020 plagiarism case

Pan, S. J.-A. (2021, February). Preventing research misconduct through education: The 2020 plagiarism case. Presented at the 4th 2021 Asia Pacific Rim Research Integrity (APRI) Network Meeting, Seoul, Korea [virtual conference]. February 25, 2021.

教學影片 | 茫茫資料海 Video: Piles of Information

許多學生在高中階段，都需要完成一份小論文，作為個人學習歷程檔案的重要資料。因此，我們製作了教學影片「茫茫資料海」，當中分享在小論文寫作的過程中，學生所需留意的議題。這部影片可作為小論文指導教師的授課之用，也可作為學生在撰寫小論文時的寫作指導資源。
We have produced an educational video, “Piles of Information,” to introduce the essential topics that high-school students need to pay more attention to when preparing their research essays. The topics include how to collect, verify, and report research materials and results professionally and ethically.

研究論文 | 學術寫作之新倫理議題「自我抄襲」：內涵演進、真實案例、現行規範與預防之道

近年學術倫理在臺灣受到高度的重視，但由於對自我抄襲的理解與討論有限，故在其認定原則與標準上，尚缺乏明確的共識。有鑑於此，本文之目的在於釐清自我抄襲的內涵，以協助學術界能由更正向與多元的角度看待這個新倫理議題。本文以文本分析法，研析過去與自我抄襲相關的文獻與規範。在論述上，本文首先探討自我抄襲的內涵，包含此概念的演進歷程、定義、判定方式、納入與排除的具體情事，以及應避免為之的原因;接續透過發生於荷蘭的真實案例，敘說自我抄襲所引起的兩極化爭議;本文亦整理出臺灣中央主管機關在自我抄襲相關規範上之沿革，並於文末提出有助於預防自我抄襲的辦法。